US District Judge Analisa Torres favored the alleged victim in her ruling, reprimanding the rapper's lawyer for 'relentless filing of combative motions.' Here's what Judge Torres

A New York judge opted to keep the identity of the woman who accused Jay-Z of raping her when she was 13 years old nearly 25 years ago a secret for now —

In the ruling, handed down on Thursday, New York Judge Analisa Torres also criticized the rapper’s legal team for what she called “relentless filing of combative motions containing inflammatory language and ad hominem attacks” against the attorneys representing the accuser.

Jay-Z’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, has received a scathing rebuke from the presiding judge on the rapper’s rape case.

Judge Analisa Torres also ruled Thursday that the Alabama woman accusing the rapper of raping her in 2000 could proceed anonymously at this early stage of the litigation.

A New York judge condemned the rapper’s attorney Alex Spiro for his “relentless filing of combative motions containing inflammatory language.”

Jay-Z's request to dismiss his case of allegedly raping a then-13-year-old and revealing his accuser’s identity have been denied by a judge. Keep watching for the details of the case and what the judge said.

A woman who claims she was raped by Jay-Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs can proceed with her lawsuit anonymously, at least for now. A federal judge in Manhattan ruled the Alabama woman's identity can remain under wraps.